Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpXPNvv_/Ex49_GM04

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → DIV(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MINUS(X, Y)
ACTIVE(geq(0, s(Y))) → MARK(false)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
MINUS(X1, mark(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
ACTIVE(div(0, s(Y))) → MARK(0)
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MINUS(X1, active(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → DIV(minus(X, Y), s(Y))
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(geq(X, 0)) → MARK(true)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → GEQ(X, Y)
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
GEQ(active(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
DIV(X1, mark(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
DIV(mark(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
GEQ(mark(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → IF(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → S(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y)))
GEQ(X1, active(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
ACTIVE(minus(0, Y)) → MARK(0)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
GEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MINUS(X, Y)
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → GEQ(X, Y)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → DIV(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MINUS(X, Y)
ACTIVE(geq(0, s(Y))) → MARK(false)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
MINUS(X1, mark(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
ACTIVE(div(0, s(Y))) → MARK(0)
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MINUS(X1, active(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → DIV(minus(X, Y), s(Y))
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(geq(X, 0)) → MARK(true)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → GEQ(X, Y)
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
GEQ(active(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
DIV(X1, mark(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
DIV(mark(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
GEQ(mark(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → IF(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → S(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y)))
GEQ(X1, active(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
ACTIVE(minus(0, Y)) → MARK(0)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
GEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MINUS(X, Y)
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → GEQ(X, Y)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 6 SCCs with 17 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (9/4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 2 + (4)x_1
POL(IF(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = (1/2)x_1 + (4)x_3

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 9/4 + x_1
POL(IF(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = (1/2)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(X1, mark(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(mark(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

DIV(X1, mark(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(mark(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = (2)x_1
POL(DIV(x₁, x₂)) = (3/2)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 3/2 + x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 9/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (9/4)x_1
POL(DIV(x₁, x₂)) = (1/2)x_1 + (3)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GEQ(X1, active(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(active(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(mark(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

GEQ(X1, active(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(active(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(mark(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 7/4 + x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 13/4 + (2)x_1
POL(GEQ(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_1 + (1/2)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 7/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 9/4 + x_1
POL(S(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS(X1, active(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(X1, mark(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MINUS(X1, active(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(X1, mark(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 7/4 + (3/2)x_1
POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂)) = x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 7/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1
POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 9/4 + x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 3
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1/2
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = 1/2
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = 1/2
POL(true) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = 1/2
POL(false) = 7/2
POL(s(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(0) = 4
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = (4)x_1 + x_2 + (4)x_3
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = x_1
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(true) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
mark(0) → active(0)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 2
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = 4
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = 9/4
POL(true) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = 4
POL(false) = 7/4
POL(s(x₁)) = (11/4)x_1
POL(0) = 7/4
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 7/8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = (4)x_1 + (2)x_2 + (4)x_3
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (2)x_1
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = 3/4
POL(true) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(0) = 3/4
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
mark(0) → active(0)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 5/4
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 4
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 3
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + (11/4)x_1 + (11/4)x_2
POL(true) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = 3
POL(false) = 3/4
POL(s(x₁)) = 7/4
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 5/2 + (1/2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 11/8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = (4)x_1 + (2)x_2 + (2)x_3
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1
POL(true) = 0
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1
POL(false) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
mark(0) → active(0)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = 3/2 + (4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + (1/2)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(true) = 0
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4
POL(false) = 15/4
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4
POL(s(x₁)) = 11/4 + (3/4)x_1
POL(0) = 3/4
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 2 + (2)x_1 + (2)x_2 + (4)x_3
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = 4
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = 2
POL(true) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (1/2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
mark(0) → active(0)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.